Tag Archives: Customer lifetime value

customer success

Customer Success: Product Creators Need To Know The Customer’s Voice

Customer success has become a key differentiator when it comes to building software products and retaining customers. Baking customer success into the product and its experience is key. Unfortunately, it has become a real challenge for many companies because silos start to form as a company grows, causing employees in various departments to become distanced from the end customer. Hence they lose connection to the customer and think less about the customer’s success. In this post, I’ll share some strategies for breaking down silos and ensuring customer success.



I am the self-appointed family travel agent. Though if you ask my partner and the rest of my family members they’d agree that I am the best person for the job.

Why?

Because over the years I have become adept at making sure I don’t overlook the details when planning a vacation—you know where the devil hides! And who wants the devil to turn up on their vacation?!

Unless of course, it’s a blue devil 😉

I take the time to read through ALL the descriptions and fine print, talk to customer support agents to find out if there are any additional fees, and make sure that family members who have accessibility needs like my 10-month-old baby and 82-year-old grandma will be taken care of.

Once I’ve done all this planning, I know I have truly earned my vacation 😉

Despite all my effort, there have been times when things didn’t turn out as planned. Like the time I booked a home in India only to find out that the address was incorrect. The host mixed the street name with the city name. We would have had to drive 3 hours after 24+ hours of travel, but I called customer support and they resolved the issue for us quickly.

Elements of customer success

It was a positive customer support experience: responsive, seamless, and efficient. As a result, I continued using that service to book my travel, knowing that if something screwy happened I could count on them next time.

But there are other companies whose customer support agents place me on hold—for more than a few minutes. When the agent returns, they tell me that I’ve reached the wrong department. Then they transfer me to the “correct” department. Once the transfer is complete, I have to repeat what I told the first support person to the second support person, all the while hoping that they can help me resolve the issue. They can’t. When I look at how much time I’ve spent, and the exorbitant fee or unreconcilable charge, I am frustrated and vow to never do business with them again!

I know I’m not alone.

No one likes being at the receiving end of a bad customer support experience

It’s easy to place blame on customer support, but it’s not their fault because the problem originated somewhere else—when the product or service’s feature was being created.

Someone designed the experience in a way that wasn’t particularly customer friendly, and then it became a challenge to change the experience because of the silos that formed in the company between teams: sales, marketing, product, engineering, and customer support.

At the start of a company, teams are usually flat and highly collaborative, but over time, silos start to form, slowing things down, making it hard to innovate, and distancing teams from their customers.

How silos stop customer success

Is it even possible to slow or stop them from forming? And to enable everyone across teams a chance to interact with customers?

Well in today’s episode of Build we’re going to answer these questions and more. We’ll show how silos form of overtime, some best practices for keeping silos at bay, and what to do once they have formed to break them down.

To help us out I’ve invited Nichole Elizabeth DeMeré who is a B2B SaaS Consultant with 20+ years of experience in online marketing, and a champion for customer success.

As you tune into today’s episode you’ll learn the following from Nichole Elizabeth:

  • Why everyone on a team including software developers and engineers should have a chance to interact with customers, not just people who are on the customer support, sales, and marketing teams
  • How to empower teams to break down silos, and a framework for evaluating experiments and features that factor in constraints
  • When to automate and when to interact with customers
  • How silos form over time, how to avoid them, and what to do once they’ve formed
  • Why when building B2B products it’s important to focus on making your customers successful not happy
  • Why you need to rethink off-boarding customers and make it easy for them to leave

“When everyone on the team is aware of the voice of the customer, everyone is super excited about what is going on (with the product).

If you really want to stand out right now it isn’t pricing, it’s team alignment and customer experience.” — Nichole Elizabeth DeMeré

Prefer to listen to the episode?

Listen on iTunes here or listen on Stitcher here.

Check out the resources Nichole Elizabeth mentions on the show:

Cost of a Customer

Too often founders and CEOs fixate on CAC (customer acquisition cost) or LTV (lifetime value of a customer), but they fail to consider the cost of a customer.  Many people tie this into COGs (cost of goods sold), but I actually think it needs to be a separate line item.  To me COGs is just how much it takes to build the product, and often times for technology products and services that is amortized as an R&D investment.  Hence, the cost of maintaining the product or service needs to be factored in.  We need to shift our thinking because we we’re no longer making shrink-wrapped software!  We’re doing SaaS (software as a service).

Unfortunately, CAC and LTV being at the forefront is a phenomenon that especially plagues startups and companies that service a broad base of customers rather than a niche market.  However, the reality is that the cost of the customer can actually narrow margins significantly impacting profitability.  Hence, the key is to think about what the cost of a customer is, and how it can be reduced.

Cost of a Customer

Calculating the cost of a customer is tricky.  You have to begin by seeing what is driving up costs, here are three major factors that contribute to it:

  1. The type of customer you are attracting.
  2. Putting a price on servicing their needs.
  3. The quality of your product or service.

The Right Type of Customer

I actually never blame a customer for asking for too much or driving up costs.  The type of customer a company attracts is well within their control.  It is up to the company to determine who is and isn’t the right fit for the product.  In the event that there isn’t a fit the customer and company shouldn’t bother to do business, it will only cause friction and drive up costs.  This is a hard idea for most founders and CEOs to adopt because it causes them to assume that it will limit their company’s growth rate.

To attract the right customer, you of course have to do customer development; understanding their needs, expectations, and what value they are seeking from your product or service.  However, if you do customer development correctly, you can then craft a marketing message that is clear and attracts that particular type of customer in mass.

For example, BizeeBee offers a self-service CRM product to independent fitness professionals and businesses (e.g. yoga studios and personal trainers).  We don’t service businesses with multiple locations or franchises.  In making the product self-service, I knew that the type of fitness professionals we’d be able to service needed to be comfortable enough with technology to get up and running by themselves, or with as minimal customer support from our end.  However, despite their degree of tech savviness, because we are focused on making a self-service product, we knew that the product needs to be as simple to use as possible.  If a potential customer comes to us asking for a lot of help to get setup we tell them that we’re probably not going to be a good fit.  Yes it kills the sale, but it also kills the long term cost.

At BizeeBee, we still talk about having great customer service, but because our product being self-service, lets customers know that they can get setup on their own.  They don’t need to wait on us to get started.  This might seem pretty obvious to most, but for our customer segment it is important to be clear with the messaging because our competitors products’ are very setup intensive.  Our goal is to empower our customers and keep our support costs down.

By baking in customer needs into the design of our product, and conveying for whom and how our product addresses those needs in our messaging we have attracted the right type of customer.

Pricing Your Product

Pricing your product also helps a lot.  At BizeeBee, we don’t appeal to the overly price sensitive customer.  Instead we’ve concluded that the price point we offer attracts customers that value our product and our time.

If it were a free product or very low cost solution there would be an element of entitlement.  The other element to pricing that people often overlook is charging the users of their product directly.  Indirect approaches such as affiliate marketing and lead generation or having two users but one customer (e.g.  marketplaces or B2B2C), can skew costs.

I’ve actually experienced this at my last startup Mint, because it was a free product it attracted millions of users!  This is something people think they want… In reality it drove up customer entitlement (requesting more features), creating the need for support staff to handle customer requests, and put a burden on engineers to spend time building features that weren’t always revenue generating.  The amount of money we were making on lead generation per customer, i.e the LTV, was significantly less than the cost of a customer.

Quality of Product

Quality is the #1 driver of customer cost.  It manifests itself in the following manner:

  • int increases the number of customer support staff you need to address customer concerns
  • it increases customer churn and reduces closing rates for sales staff
  • it impedes the time engineers spend on creating new products because they are more focused on fixing bugs

Now some companies take the strategy of charging their customers for technical support.  I think paying for technical support only makes sense if a customer wants additional maintenance, i.e to add features to a product or receive help/training getting setup.   Barring those two, having a customer pay for a defective product will definitely leave them thinking twice about doing business with you going forward.

Finally, the cost of a customer will change as the number of customers go up.  This is because servicing more customers means you’ll have more operational expenses such as building or maintaining infrastructure to support the larger number of customers.  You can offset the increased costs by looking for services that will support the larger load.  But you’ll still have an interim period of growing pains that will need to be addressed.

There isn’t an exact formula to determine the cost of a customer, but the point is to be aware of what contributes to it, and factor it into various aspects of your business namely: product quality and the type of customer you’re attracting through your marketing and pricing.

Do you want help determining the cost of a customer for your product? Then check out our Lean Product Development Course Learn more!

Enhanced by Zemanta

How to Set Realistic Goals for Your Startup in 2013

As 2013 approaches I know many startup founders will sit down to set milestones and goals for the upcoming year.  Its easy to want to shoot for the sky, after all the bigger the goal the bigger the reward right?  Wrong.  I’ve seen too many businesses over the past couple of years that have aimed high but in the nascent stages of their company have really struggled, and ultimately had to shut down this year.  The fundamental problem was that the founders believed that the goals for the year were accomplishable.  But they didn’t take stock of what it would take to accomplish the goals they had set and the time involved with the following:

  • Closing a round of funding.
  • Building relationships that turn into profitable partnerships.
  • Shipping product enhancements.
  • Recruiting additional staff.

Not to mention gauging their own ability to stomach each setback, and stay focused in a recessionary market.

Having experienced a number of these issues myself this year, and being pretty resourceful I’ve built up an arsenal of contingency plans A-Z!

A number of people call upon my expertise to help them weather this market.  So for the number of startups I consult for I do the following.  The first thing I do is take stock of ALL activity this past year, because worse case I want the founder to be able to maintain stability if 2013 continues to be recessionary year.  I sit down with each founder and analyze the following:

  • Costs incurred for every area of business: staff, production, distribution
  • Monthly sales figures
  • ROI of marketing channels

The second thing I do is ask the following 3 questions:

  1. What contributed to the monthly sales figures, and how much of it was new v. repeat business?
  2. What is the consistent feedback on the product or service from customers?
  3. What are your goals for 2013?

Based on the numbers for #1 I’ll know if there is potential for more growth in 2013.  I can suggest strategies to get repeat business, because it costs 6X as much to get a new customer as it does to sell to an existing one!

To get new customers I look at conversion metrics.  By this I mean how many potential customers or impressions (in the case of online businesses) did you see each month, and how many customers did you actually sell to?  I don’t get too nuanced into the lifetime value of each customer just yet.  Instead I want to see if there is a monthly pattern in the number of leads and if that translates to a consistent sales figures.

For example, one of the startups I consult for had been keeping good metrics of both in-store sales, and online sales.  The founder knew that her conversion rate for in-store sales was 50%, she was able to show this for about 4 to 5 months.  Her metrics for online sales was not nearly as high, but there was some consistency in the number of visitors to closed sales for a period of time that helped us arrive at a percentage for it.

Knowing the conversion rate I was able to suggest a realistic goal for what revenue figures she could achieve for in-store sales each month, what each sales persons monthly quota should be, and suggest ways for attracting more customers.  Note: I did not come up with schemes or experiments to increase her conversion rate!  I let past performance numbers create a structure to set realistic goals for 2013.  This way she will know what being on-track means, which is critical for a startup.

For #2 if there are any obvious product issues then those will need to be resolved before we can move forward.  I do not mean requests for enhancements, I just mean something faulty with the product itself that would cause would-be customers to become disinterested or want a refund on purchased items.

#3 is a little more nuanced, however, I do encourage founders who might have more than 3 goals to pare down.  They key is to start by throwing out goals you know rely on too many X-factors such as ones listed in the above bullets (basically, any resource you don’t have today, and would require a number of different steps to procure).  For example, one founder wanted to expand her product line, but she didn’t have the capital to make this happen.  The additional capital would mean lining up investors, and pitching her business.  She didn’t want to focus on fundraising because it would take time away from building her business, and one of her goals was to control her own destiny.  So I encouraged her to hold off on expanding her product line until 2014, demonstrating how it would increase costs, and instead have her focus more on building up cash reserves in 2013 to then be able to fund the product line expansion the following year.

Finally, I do factor in room for experiments.  But the key is to come up with the list of activities ahead of time, pin point who and how they will be executed, and also set criteria to judge the success or failure based on numbers!  This prevents people from changing course mid-year, or taking on too much and achieving nothing.

As you are getting ready to set goals for your startup in 2013 you can run through these exercises yourself.  The key takeaways are:

  • Look at patterns of past success to forecast what will happen in the following year.
  • Make sure you have a solid product or service that customers derive value from.
  • Isolate goals to what you know is well within your control and you have the resources to accomplish them.
  • Leave room for experimentation, but make sure all the experiments are accounted for as much as possible.

Finally, if you are interested in working with me I do have room to take on 2 additional startups.  Feel free to contact me or sign up for an office hours slot so we can chat more to see if I can help.

Wishing you a prosperous 2013!

 

Enhanced by Zemanta